Case 2301213/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr R Wright — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301213/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the judgment dated 26 July 2022, Employment Judge Siddall at Croydon, the tribunal recorded that Mr Mark Luckhurst was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment from London Bus and Truck Limited. The award was set at £13,872. The judgment also awarded damages for breach of contract in relation to twelve weeks' notice pay in the gross sum of £6,528.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded eight days' pay of £870.40 gross. It also awarded £108.80 gross in relation to one day's annual leave that had accrued but had not been taken. The total award to the claimant was £21,379.20.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £13,872 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for twelve weeks' notice pay, gross. | Upheld | — | £6,528 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for eight days' pay, gross. | Upheld | — | £870 |
| Holiday pay | Award for one day's accrued but untaken annual leave, gross. | Upheld | — | £109 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,379
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.