Case 2301220/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Isah v Mr R Odong t/a Delta Nursing Agency Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301220/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Isah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Isah brought a claim for arrears of pay said to arise from work undertaken between August and October 2018 at hospitals where she was placed as a nurse. The claim form was presented on 27 March 2020 after Acas early conciliation between 12 January and 12 February 2020. The tribunal said the claim could be understood either as a breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994 or as an unauthorised deductions from wages claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Employment Judge Tsamados held that the claim was presented outside the relevant time limits. On the tribunal's calculation, the claim was about two and a half years late. The judgment recorded that, for the early conciliation process to help, the claimant needed to notify Acas within three months of the date payment was due, or within three months of termination if the claim were treated as a breach of contract matter.
The judge noted there is a discretion to extend time if it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and it was then brought within a further reasonable period, but the claimant did not attend and gave no evidence on why that discretion should be exercised. The claim was therefore dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. The judge also noted the respondent's points that the claimant may have sued the wrong person and may have been self-employed, but did not comment on those issues beyond recording them as part of the defence.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay said to relate to work done between August and October 2018. The tribunal treated it as potentially an unlawful deduction from wages claim under section 13 ERA 1996, or alternatively as a breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994. It was dismissed for being out of time, so the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- article 7 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994
- not reasonably practicable
- further reasonable period of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.