Case 2301221/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Stevens v Berry Bexhill 2 Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301221/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Representation
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Stevens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Ashford on 21 August 2019 before Employment Judge Nash. The claimant, Ms D Stevens, was represented by Mr Rowley of counsel. The respondent, Berry Bexhill 2 Ltd, did not appear.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for compensation related to annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It ordered the respondent to pay £870.20.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further findings or breakdown of the award are set out in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Award of £870.20 as compensation related to annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £870 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £870
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.