Case 2301226/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Smith v Future Leisure Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301226/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment in Mr C Smith's claim against Future Leisure Limited. It recorded that, by a letter dated 11 June 2020, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, that the claimant had not complied with an order dated 11 June 2020, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment states that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive determination of the underlying employment claim was made and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 11 June 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.