Case 2301240/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sarah Cameron v KJM Property (Tunbridge Wells) Limited RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301240/2023
- Decision date
- 8 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms E Wiles, Mrs S Goldthorpe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sarah Cameron
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing held in public by CVP at Ashford on 1 July 2024 before Employment Judge R S Drake, sitting with Ms E Wiles and Mrs S Goldthorpe. The claimant was represented by her husband and the respondent by counsel. The hearing had been listed for 2 to 5 July 2024 before a full panel.
The tribunal recorded that it had received formal signed written confirmation from the claimant withdrawing her claims and confirmation from ACAS by production of a completed COT3. On that basis, it dismissed all claims in the proceedings in their entirety on terms of settlement having been reached.
No substantive findings on liability were made and no monetary award was recorded. The full-panel hearing listed for the rest of that week was de-listed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal recorded that it had received formal signed written confirmation from the claimant withdrawing her claims and confirmation from ACAS by production of a completed COT3; it then dismissed all claims in their entirety on terms of settlement having been reached. | Settled | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that it had received formal signed written confirmation from the claimant withdrawing her claims and confirmation from ACAS by production of a completed COT3; it then dismissed all claims in their entirety on terms of settlement having been reached. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that it had received formal signed written confirmation from the claimant withdrawing her claims and confirmation from ACAS by production of a completed COT3; it then dismissed all claims in their entirety on terms of settlement having been reached. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.