Case 2301244/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ravi Karimi v Orcan Intelligence Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301244/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ravi Karimi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Karimi worked for Orcan Intelligence Limited for about six months and left on 29 November 2022. The dispute concerned outstanding commission of £11,500 gross and, separately, a claim for accrued but unpaid annual leave. After a meeting on 4 November 2022, Mr Bouvier emailed on 7 November 2022 confirming that commission would be paid if Mr Karimi did not discuss the conversation negatively with staff or anyone else; the tribunal found that this email formed a variation of the employment contract.
The tribunal heard evidence that after Mr Karimi’s departure information circulated in the recruitment market suggesting Orcan had financial difficulties. It found, on the balance of probabilities, that the information came from Mr Karimi and that this was a clear breach of the 7 November agreement, even if it was inadvertent. The tribunal also found that Mr Karimi had spoken to Mr Mackie, who then circulated the information and approached other staff about leaving.
On that basis, the tribunal held that there was no breach of contract by Orcan and no unlawful deduction from wages, because the amount properly due to Mr Karimi had been determined by the later agreement. The unlawful deduction claim was dismissed. The separate annual leave claim had been paid by the respondent and was also dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned outstanding commission payments of £11,500 gross. Dismissed because the 7 November 2022 agreement varied the contract and fixed what was properly due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Alternative claim concerning the same commission dispute. Dismissed on the basis that the original contract had been varied by the later agreement. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim in respect of accrued but unpaid annual leave. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had paid it, and the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.