Case 2301256/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Juggoo v Seaford Golf Club Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301256/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Juggoo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South on 21 August 2023, Employment Judge McLaren recorded that Mr M Juggoo withdrew his unfair dismissal claim and his discrimination claim on the protected characteristic of religion. Both of those claims were therefore dismissed upon withdrawal.
The judgment also recorded that a claim for direct discrimination related to dismissal was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic for that struck-out claim, so it is recorded here as other.
The respondent's application for a deposit order in relation to the remaining discrimination claims was refused. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Other | A claim for direct discrimination related to dismissal was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. The extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic for this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.