Case 2301265/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JH Kim v GHR UK Limited and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301265/2019
- Decision date
- 10 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr JH Kim
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr JH Kim brought proceedings against GHR UK Limited, Seung Hoon Kang and Seong Hee Park under case numbers 2301265/2019 and 2302735/2019. In the judgment dated 10 January 2020, Employment Judge Hyams-Parish recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The extracted judgment text does not record any findings on the substance of the underlying complaints, and it does not set out any compensation or other remedy. The case ended on withdrawal rather than a determination on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits determination appears in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits determination appears in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits determination appears in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.