Case 2301267/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr A Nartey (CEO) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301267/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Bryant QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a single claim by Miss S Radziunaite for pay in lieu of statutory holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998. Employment Judge K Bryant QC found that the claim was well-founded.
The judgment does not set out detailed factual findings or legal analysis in the written record provided. It records only that the respondent, Imonitor Limited, was ordered to pay the claimant compensation in the sum of £309.62.
No other claims, remedies, or legal tests are identified in the decision, and the written reasons section states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The tribunal held the claim for pay in lieu of statutory holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded and ordered compensation of £309.62. | Upheld | — | £310 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £310
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £310
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.