Case 2301275/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Babalola, Solicitor For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301275/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs F Babalola, Solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural hearing at London South before Employment Judge Blackwell sitting alone on 28 November 2019. The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend the claim form. It also refused the respondents' application to remove the first respondent, Ms Sally Dibben, the third respondent, Ms Ruth Hogg, and the fourth respondent, Ms Cyprianah Sodeinde, from the proceedings.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No substantive findings on the underlying employment claims, liability, or remedy are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is procedural only. It records that the claimant's application to amend the claim form was refused and that the respondents' application to remove the first, third and fourth respondents was refused. No substantive liability claim was determined in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.