Case 2301291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Nell (in person) For the v Relaxed Dining Holdings Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301291/2019
- Decision date
- 22 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Nell (in person) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Chantal Nell brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract against Relaxed Dining Holdings Ltd (In Liquidation). The respondent did not attend the hearing and no ET3 was presented. Employment Judge Hyams-Parish sat alone and heard the case at London South Employment Tribunal on 17 July 2019.
The tribunal held that both the unlawful deductions from wages claim and the breach of contract claim succeeded. It awarded the claimant a gross sum of £16,228.35. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on that sum, if any.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claim of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded, but it did not apportion the gross award between this claim and the breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that the breach of contract claim succeeded, but it did not apportion the gross award between this claim and the unlawful deductions claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,228
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.