Case 2301301/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Sanz Burgos v Convivia Construction Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301301/2024
- Decision date
- 18 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Sanz Burgos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 14 January 2024 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Ramsden Date therefore determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the substantive claims, the tribunal found that Convivia Construction Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £9,317.70 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £5,833.33 gross damages.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,929.00, calculated on the basis that he was 37 years old and had 3 years' service. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £460.38.
The judgment stated that the respondent must pay £17,540.41 gross in total. The extracted text shows the total as "£17,540,41", which appears to be a punctuation error, but the total is consistent with the individual sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £9,318 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £5,833 |
| Redundancy | The redundancy payment was calculated on the basis that the claimant was 37 years old and had 3 years' service. | Upheld | — | £1,929 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £460 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,540
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.