Case 2301314/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Satkunarasa v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301314/2021
- Decision date
- 29 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Satkunarasa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing and was not represented. The tribunal clerk attempted to contact him using the email address and telephone numbers he had provided, without success, and the hearing proceeded in his absence.
The claim had included complaints of disability discrimination, race discrimination, unfair dismissal, and damages for breach of contract in respect of notice pay. The disability and race discrimination complaints had already stood dismissed after the claimant failed to comply with an unless order requiring further information.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment at the effective date of termination and therefore lacked the required service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The notice pay breach of contract complaint was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend and had provided insufficient details; the tribunal also stated that, on the information before it, it would in any event have dismissed that complaint as unfounded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment with the respondent as required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in respect of notice pay were dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing; the tribunal also stated it would in any event have dismissed the complaint as unfounded on the information before it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination complaint stood dismissed after the claimant did not comply with an unless order requiring further information of the discrimination complaints. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination complaint stood dismissed after the claimant did not comply with an unless order requiring further information of the discrimination complaints. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.