Case 2301323/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person with assistance from Ms C Brown (daughter) For the v Ms J Charalambous (litigation consultant) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301323/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person with assistance from Ms C Brown (daughter) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Webster at London South on 30 April 2021. The claimant appeared in person with assistance from her daughter, Ms C Brown, and the respondent was represented by Ms J Charalambous, Solicitor.
The only determination recorded in the judgment was the claimant's application to amend her claim so as to include claims for disability discrimination. That application was refused. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the underlying dismissal, redundancy, breach of contract, or wages issues in this document.
No remedy was awarded in the judgment, and no lay members are listed. The decision therefore records a procedural ruling only, rather than a final determination of the substantive claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | At a preliminary hearing on 30 April 2021, the claimant's application to amend her claim to include disability discrimination was refused. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.