Case 2301323/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Pinto Pereira De Almeida v J C Antunes Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301323/2021
- Decision date
- 8 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Pinto Pereira De Almeida
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Fowell. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, dismissed her by reason of redundancy so that she was entitled to a redundancy payment, and failed to pay holiday pay. The judgment records that the claim succeeded.
No monetary award was fixed in this judgment. The tribunal directed that remedy would be determined at a separate remedy hearing listed by telephone for two hours, and that a notice of hearing would follow shortly.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.