Case 2301328/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Katy White v Dr A Mohamedali & Dr R Forgan t/a Grove Medical Centre — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301328/2021
- Decision date
- 26 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell
- Panel members
- Ms N Christofi, Ms S Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Katy White
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Miss Katy White’s complaint of indirect discrimination on grounds of sex. The judgment does not set out further written reasons, recording instead that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal also found that there had been a failure to comply with section 80H Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to the claimant’s flexible working request. It awarded compensation of £1,068.75 for that failure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The complaint of indirect discrimination on grounds of sex was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Flexible working | The tribunal found there had been a failure to comply with section 80H Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of the claimant’s flexible working request. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,069
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,069
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 80H Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.