Case 2301331/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jones v JG Appleford Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301331/2020
- Decision date
- 16 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr S Jones against JG Appleford Ltd. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £8,669. The award was described as being in respect of overtime worked each week, pay due in January 2020, and five days in lieu unpaid.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract as to notice and awarded £750 damages. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,600. The listed hearing on 3 February 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross/net sum of £8,669 for overtime worked each week, pay due in January 2020, and five days in lieu unpaid. | Upheld | — | £8,669 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £750 damages. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,600. | Upheld | — | £3,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,019
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.