Case 2301334/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Manne v Poundland Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 2301334/2016
- Decision date
- 12 January 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on a single issue: whether Mr V Manne was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. The tribunal also noted that this claim was consolidated with his second claim, no. 2301747/2017. No merits issues or remedy were decided in this judgment.
The tribunal accepted medical evidence showing stress and depression from around the end of December 2016, including GP records from 4 January 2017, a change to Sertraline on 15 February 2017, a diagnosis of work-related stress on 3 March 2017, a letter from South London & Maudsley NHS Trust dated 15 June 2017, and evidence that CBT began in April 2017. It also relied on Med 3 forms and the claimant’s oral evidence about the effect on his day-to-day life.
The tribunal found compelling evidence of a mental impairment, namely stress and depression, continuing at least until the effective date of termination on 23 June 2017. It was satisfied that the impairment had a long-term effect and that the claimant’s normal day-to-day activities were adversely affected in a substantial way. It rejected the respondent’s argument that the evidence showed only a reaction to adverse circumstances, and concluded that the claimant was disabled at the material time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time. The judgment consolidated this claim with case 2301747/2017, but did not determine any liability or remedy on the merits. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Equality Act 2010 s.6
- Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 2
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.