Case 2301343/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms P Hall, Consultant at Peninsula — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301343/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Amy Maynard, had worked for Helgor Trading Limited from 17 March 2017 until she resigned on 29 May 2018. The tribunal recorded that the respondent conceded she was, at the material time, a disabled person, and that she said she had resigned because the working environment and the respondent's failure to make reasonable adjustments affected her post-traumatic stress disorder.
The tribunal's task was limited to jurisdiction: the claim was presented on 16 April 2019, nearly eight months after the relevant date, so it was outside the three-month time limit for an Equality Act claim. The ACAS early conciliation period did not extend time because the certificate showed the conciliation period ending on the same day the claim was presented.
The claimant said she delayed bringing proceedings because she had made a conscious commercial decision not to "rock the boat" while a related company, Contrast Security Limited, depended heavily on the respondent's contract and she feared the contract might be terminated if she pursued a claim. The tribunal accepted that explanation as her reason for delay, but held it did not provide a basis for extending time.
Applying the section 123 Equality Act 2010 discretion, and referring to British Coal Corporation v Keeble and Others and Roberts v Bexley Leisure Community Centre trading as Leisurelink, Employment Judge Britton concluded that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The claim was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and the tribunal did not reach the substance of the disability discrimination complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed because the claim was presented out of time and the tribunal was not satisfied it was just and equitable to extend time under section 123 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal did not determine the merits of the alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble and Others
- Roberts v Bexley Leisure Community Centre trading as Leisurelink
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.