Case 2301345/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Agata Cacova v Gallowglass Security Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301345/2021
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Agata Cacova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Croydon hearing on 9 May 2023, Employment Judge Fowell dealt with the case of Ms Agata Cacova v Gallowglass Security Limited by video. The claimant did not appear; the respondent was represented by Ernestina Afriyie of Peninsula Business Services Limited. The judgment records that the claim was struck out in its entirety under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure because the claimant had failed to comply with Tribunal Orders and had not actively pursued the claim. The judgment does not include any substantive determination of the merits or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim types in the text; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out in its entirety under rule 37 for failure to comply with Tribunal Orders and for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.