Case 2301351/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Keith Lee v Renewable Energy Supplies Limited (in liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301351/2022
- Decision date
- 17 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rea Representation
- Venue
- London South ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Keith Lee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Keith Lee’s claim was heard at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 10 January 2023 before Employment Judge Rea. The respondent, Renewable Energy Supplies Limited (in liquidation), did not attend. The tribunal gave its decision orally at the hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Lee £750 gross and stated that the claimant is responsible for accounting to HMRC for any income tax and National Insurance contributions owed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded and ordered payment of £750 gross. The judgment states the claimant is responsible for accounting to HMRC for any income tax and National Insurance deductions owed. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.