Case 2301362/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Home Comfort Care Agency Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301362/2023
- Decision date
- 15 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Neill Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Hasnat worked as a care assistant for Home Comfort Care Agency Limited from 28 November 2022 until she resigned by email on 12 March 2023. The tribunal found that she was an employee or worker within section 230 ERA 1996 and that she was not given written particulars at the start of employment. It found that the contract was signed in early February 2023 and backdated, and that WhatsApp messages showed ongoing confusion about pay, hours, and travel expenses.
On wages, the tribunal compared the payslips with the bank records and found that £127.94 had been withheld from wages. The respondent did not show that the deduction was required or authorised by statute or by the contract, and the claimant had not agreed in advance to any deduction, so the unlawful deduction claim succeeded. On expenses, the tribunal found that the parties had an oral agreement that travel expenses would be reimbursed for the period before the expenses process was clarified and before the claimant bought her own car.
The tribunal held that the unreimbursed expenses claim was outstanding when employment ended and awarded damages for breach of contract in the sum of £278.78. That figure comprised £136.28 for public transport costs and £142.50 for mileage. The separate request for £3,751.75 as compensation for inconvenience was dismissed. The respondent was ordered to pay a gross total of £406.72.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found £127.94 had been withheld from wages after comparing payslips with bank records. It found no statutory or contractual authorisation for the deduction and no prior written consent. | Upheld | — | £128 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found an oral agreement that reasonable travel expenses would be reimbursed. It awarded £136.28 for public transport costs and £142.50 for mileage, totalling £278.78. | Upheld | — | £279 |
| Other | The claimant's request for £3,751.75 compensation for inconvenience was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £407
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.230 ERA96
- s.13 ERA96
- s.27(1) ERA96
- s.23(2) ERA96
- Agarwal v Cardiff University & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 1434
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.