Case 2301379/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Christopher v Department for Work and Pensions — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301379/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
- Venue
- Croydon via CVP
- Panel members
- Mr K Murphy, Mr M O'Connor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Christopher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Croydon via CVP before Employment Judge Wright with two lay members, recorded a unanimous judgment that the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record does not provide the factual findings, pleaded issues, or legal reasoning, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's claims fail and are dismissed. The extracted judgment text does not set out pleaded issues or reasons; age discrimination is identified in the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's claims fail and are dismissed. The extracted judgment text does not set out pleaded issues or reasons; race discrimination is identified in the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's claims fail and are dismissed. The extracted judgment text does not set out pleaded issues or reasons; sex discrimination is identified in the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.