Case 2301390/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr John McArdle, Chartered Legal Executive — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301390/2020
- Decision date
- 18 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A. Beale Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 18 February 2021 before Employment Judge A Beale sitting alone in London South, the Claimant was in person and the Respondent was represented by Mr John McArdle, Chartered Legal Executive. The judgment records that the Claimant's claims for breach of contract and unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed because they were withdrawn by the Claimant.
The tribunal also dealt with the Claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal. That claim failed and was dismissed. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the judgment.
No monetary award is recorded in the decision. The judgment contains only the procedural outcomes above and does not set out any separate remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The Claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.