Case 2301393/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Angelo Gobbi v SE Twenty Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301393/2022
- Decision date
- 9 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Angelo Gobbi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London South by CVP before Employment Judge Hart, heard the matter on 6 October 2022. The respondent did not attend. The claimant succeeded on all three issues determined in the oral judgment.
First, the tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant's wages for January 2022. It ordered payment of £1,777.59 net. Second, it held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by deducting the claimant's pension contributions and failing to pay those contributions into the pension scheme. It ordered payment of £497.13.
Third, the tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. It ordered compensation of 2 weeks' gross pay, assessed at £889.80. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £3,164.52.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction of wages by failing to pay the claimant his wages for January 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,778 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction of wages by deducting the claimant's pension contributions and failing to pay those contributions into the pension scheme. | Upheld | — | £497 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars and ordered 2 weeks' gross pay in compensation. | Upheld | — | £890 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,165
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.