Case 2301394/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Savage v Abellio London Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301394/2022
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Savage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe remedy judgment followed an oral liability judgment in which the Tribunal found in the claimant's favour on unfair dismissal, underpayment of notice pay, and underpayment of accrued but untaken holiday pay. The claimant had worked as a bus driver from June 2015 until dismissal on 18 January 2022 and had been absent from work because of mental ill health since October 2021.
For notice pay, the Tribunal found the claimant was entitled to six weeks' notice at £750 gross per week, giving £4,500 gross. The respondent had paid £3,470.60 gross, leaving an underpayment of £1,029.40. For holiday pay, the Tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 8.25 days, including six rolled-over days and a pro-rated 2022 entitlement, giving £1,237.50 gross; after crediting £993.52 already paid, the underpayment was £243.98.
For unfair dismissal compensation, the Tribunal calculated the basic award by reference to the claimant's age, six years' service, and the statutory weekly pay cap, resulting in £4,896. It assessed financial loss up to 25 July 2022, took account of sick pay entitlement, notice pay, loss of statutory protection, and pension contributions, made no Polkey reduction, found no failure to mitigate, and made no ACAS uplift. The judgment's stated awards are £4,896 for the basic award and £14,307.25 for the compensatory award, producing a total award of £20,476.63.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability had already been determined in the claimant's favour. The judgment awards a basic award of £4,896 and labels the compensatory award as £14,307.25, though the reasons contain some internal inconsistency in the compensatory award calculations. | Upheld | — | £19,203 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Underpayment of notice pay, described by the judgment as an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,029 |
| Holiday pay | Underpayment in the payment made in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement at dismissal. | Upheld | — | £244 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,477
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,896
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £14,307
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd 1988 ICR 142, HL
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.