Case 2301401/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Grainger v Burberry Harris Moon — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301401/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Grainger
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr David Grainger's claim against Burberry Harris Moon. Employment Judge Martin recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal had previously given the claimant an opportunity on 19 February 2020 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. On that basis, the claim was struck out on 25 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s) beyond the case being struck out. The reasons state that the respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not applied to restore it to the register of companies, and the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 19 February 2020 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.