Case 2301412/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Mahajan v Old Town Playgroup — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301412/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rahman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Mahajan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Mahajan’s complaints of breach of contract in relation to notice pay and holiday pay were dismissed. The tribunal recorded those two complaints in the judgment and did not award any sum for them.
The tribunal also determined, under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. The amount awarded was £860.79, which was the only monetary award made in the judgment.
The hearing was held at London South by CVP on 19 December 2023 and 9 January 2024 before Employment Judge Rahman. The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment of £860.79. | Upheld | — | £861 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £861
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.