Case 2301425/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R K Singh v Old Town Playgroup — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301425/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rahman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R K Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant’s breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay and also dismissed the complaint in respect of holiday pay. Those claims were not awarded any monetary sum.
The tribunal upheld the redundancy payment claim. It determined, under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, that Mrs R K Singh was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,572. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint in relation to notice pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,572. | Upheld | — | £4,572 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,572
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.