Case 2301438/2019 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v Brasserie Vacherin — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301438/2019
- Decision date
- 30 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South on 30 January 2020 before Employment Judge Balogun. The Claimants did not attend and the Respondent did not appear. The judgment states that all claims were dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2013 because of the Claimants' non-attendance.
No substantive findings on liability, evidence, or remedy are recorded in the extracted judgment text. The decision is confined to dismissal of the proceedings for non-attendance, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim in the extracted text; this claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim in the extracted text; this claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.