Case 2301441/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Vig v Old Town Playgroup — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301441/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rahman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Vig
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay. It also dismissed the complaint in respect of holiday pay.
Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,057.20. Reasons were given orally, and the written judgment does not set out further findings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the complaint in respect of holiday pay is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment determines under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,057.20. | Upheld | — | £4,057 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,057
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.