Case 2301456/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Ettridge v Thales Training & Simulation Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 2301456/2017
- Decision date
- 9 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hildebrand Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Ettridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 2301456/2017 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr G Ettridge. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the extracted text.
The case title and listing information identify Thales Training & Simulation Limited as the respondent and indicate age discrimination and disability discrimination as the categories recorded for the case. The judgment itself does not provide any separate findings on those issues before the withdrawal.
No remedy was awarded, and the extracted judgment contains no compensation figure or other monetary award. The decision is limited to the dismissal of the proceedings after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the extracted text does not separate the individual age discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the extracted text does not separate the individual disability discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.