Case 2301456/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Ahmad v Force 10 Security Ltd (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301456/2018
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Ahmad
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy correspondence dated 9 February 2019 and 29 April 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The short judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying unlawful deduction from wages or working time allegations, and it does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit and does not distinguish separate outcomes for the listed categories; this entry reflects the listed unlawful deduction from wages category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit and does not distinguish separate outcomes for the listed categories; this entry reflects the listed working time category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.