Case 2301463/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Hare and others (see attached schedule) v Brighton & Hove Bus And Coach Company Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301463/2014
- Decision date
- 27 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Hare and others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claims in case number 2301463/2014 and the other scheduled matters brought by Mr C Hare and others against Brighton & Hove Bus And Coach Company Limited were dismissed because they had not been actively pursued. The decision is dated 27 April 2022 and is signed by Employment Judge McLaren.
The extracted text does not set out any merits findings on the underlying complaints, any reasoned liability analysis, or any monetary award. The only recorded basis for disposal is that the claims had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying head of claim; this type is taken from the case listing/context. The claims were dismissed because they had not been actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying head of claim; this type is taken from the case listing/context. The claims were dismissed because they had not been actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.