Case 2301475/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301475/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish, heard the case on 25 September 2019 and 2 October 2019. The only claim recorded in the judgment was unlawful deductions from wages brought by Mr J Hallam against JCB Medway Ltd.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s unlawful deductions from wages claim succeeded. No written reasons were provided in the record because reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would only be supplied if requested within 14 days.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,000.00 gross on or before 16 October 2019. The judgment also stated that the claimant was responsible for any tax and national insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim and ordered the respondent to pay £1,000.00 gross by 16 October 2019. The claimant was responsible for any tax and national insurance due on that sum. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.