Case 2301479/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. D Watts v Ms Yvonne Hepburn Chair of the Management Committee — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301479/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. D Watts
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment dated 26 November 2020, Employment Judge Sage recorded that Mr D Watts had claims for an unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract in respect of notice, redundancy payment, and holiday entitlement. The respondent was Ms Yvonne Hepburn, described as Chair of the Management Committee.
The tribunal upheld each of those claims. It ordered payment of £2,172.98 for unauthorised deduction from wages, £740.22 for breach of contract in respect of notice, £12,337.50 as a redundancy payment, and £448.68 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The text does not set out further reasoning beyond the stated orders.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,173 |
| Breach of contract | The extracted text shows '££740.22'; this has been treated as £740.22. | Upheld | — | £740 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £12,338 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £449 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,699
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.