Case 2301483/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K White v Precious Beauty Banstead — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301483/2023
- Decision date
- 12 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at London South on 12 October 2023 before Employment Judge Heath. The claimant, Ms K White, appeared in person and the respondent, Precious Beauty Banstead, was represented by Ms Whelan.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the net sum of £103 and ordered the respondent to pay that amount to the claimant. The written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a well-founded complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £103 net. | Upheld | — | £103 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £103
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.