Case 2301484/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Walker, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301484/2020
- Decision date
- 14 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton Date
- Panel members
- Ms G Mitchell, Ms N Murphy
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr M Walker, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 14 November 2022, at London South, Employment Judge Morton sat with Ms G Mitchell and Ms N Murphy. The decision was recorded as a judgment by consent in case 2301484/2020 between Ms J Brinklow and London General Transport Services Limited.
The tribunal recorded that, by consent, all of the claimant's claims against the respondent were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not contain separate liability findings on the individual claims and does not set out any factual or legal conclusions beyond that agreed disposal.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The decision is limited to the consensual dismissal on withdrawal and does not address remedy, liability apportionment, or any substantive tribunal reasoning on the merits of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that, by consent, all of the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. This claim type is inferred from the case listing metadata; the judgment itself does not separate out the individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that, by consent, all of the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. This claim type is inferred from the case listing metadata; the judgment itself does not separate out the individual claims. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that, by consent, all of the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. This claim type is inferred from the case listing metadata; the judgment itself does not separate out the individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that, by consent, all of the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. This claim type is inferred from the case listing metadata; the judgment itself does not separate out the individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.