Case 2301492/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Prokshi v ECSI Ltd t/a Colicci Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301492/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Prokshi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mrs M Prokshi's claim against ECSI Ltd t/a Colicci Ltd. By letter dated 25 February 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons identified were that the proceedings had been conducted in a manner the Tribunal described as scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious, that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 25 February 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore ordered that the claim be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 25 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.