Case 2301506/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Osagie v Serco Limited and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301506/2018
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr J Osagie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 1 December 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's Order dated 12 November 2021.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type indicated by the gov.uk listing; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Claim type indicated by the gov.uk listing; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim type indicated by the gov.uk listing; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type indicated by the gov.uk listing; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.