Case 2301514/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Christine McAleney v 1) Gatwick Hotels Limited 2) Silver Hopkins Hotel Management Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301514/2017
- Decision date
- 18 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Christine McAleney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 19 March 2019 before Acting Regional Employment Judge P Davies, with no attendance by either respondent, the tribunal found that Miss Christine McAleney had been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed by Silver Hopkins Hotel Management Ltd. It ordered the second respondent to pay compensation of £9,489.36.
The tribunal applied the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 as amended. It recorded a recoupment period of 31 January 2017 to 8 May 2017, a prescribed element of £953.46, and an amount by which the total monetary award exceeded the prescribed element of £8,535.90.
The tribunal also found that both respondents were liable to pay £2,730.13 for failure to consult pursuant to the TUPE transfer duties. The judgment contains no further breakdown of the dismissal award between unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the second respondent. The judgment did not split the £9,489.36 award between the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal findings. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal also found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed by the second respondent. The judgment did not split the £9,489.36 award between the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal findings. | Upheld | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The first and second respondents were ordered to pay £2,730.13 for failure to consult pursuant to the TUPE transfer duties. | Upheld | — | £2,730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,219
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,489
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.