Case 2301526/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Verrall and Parks Ltd (In Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301526/2019
- Decision date
- 25 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South Employment Tribunal on 25 July 2019, before Employment Judge Balogun, with the claimant appearing in person and no appearance for the respondent, the tribunal upheld the claimant’s unlawful deduction of wages claim. It found that the respondent owed the claimant £1,193.49 gross in respect of arrears of pay for the period 1 to 17 December 2018.
The written judgment records that all other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The operative part does not identify those claims individually, and no further remedy was recorded beyond the gross wage arrears award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment held that the unlawful deduction of wages claim succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay £1,193.49 gross in respect of arrears of pay for 1 to 17 December 2018. | Upheld | — | £1,193 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal, but it does not identify the withdrawn claims individually in the operative part. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal, but it does not identify the withdrawn claims individually in the operative part. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal, but it does not identify the withdrawn claims individually in the operative part. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,193
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.