Case 2301531/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Wilmont v BaxterStorey Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301531/2019
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Wilmont
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr C Wilmont's claim against Baxterstorey Limited was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings of fact or law are set out in the judgment text.
The judgment does not identify the individual claims in its operative wording, give reasons on liability, or record any remedy. In light of the case listing categories, the extracted claim entries have been tagged as unfair dismissal and breach of contract, but the judgment itself contains only a withdrawal dismissal and no adjudication on the merits of either claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that 'The claim is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant'. The specific causes of action are not identified in the judgment text, although the listing categories indicate breach of contract and unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that 'The claim is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant'. The specific causes of action are not identified in the judgment text, although the listing categories indicate breach of contract and unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.