Case 2301550/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A James v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301550/2018
- Decision date
- 31 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A James
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss A James brought proceedings against Guy’s And St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust under case number 2301550/2018.
Employment Judge Khalil dismissed the proceedings following the Claimant's withdrawal of the claim. The judgment does not record any findings on liability or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant; the age discrimination classification is taken from the listing category, as the judgment text does not particularise the discrimination claims. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant; the race discrimination classification is taken from the listing category, as the judgment text does not particularise the discrimination claims. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant; the sex discrimination classification is taken from the listing category, as the judgment text does not particularise the discrimination claims. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.