Case 2301550/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Stevenson v Compass Academy Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301550/2022
- Decision date
- 7 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macey Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Stevenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London South by CVP before Employment Judge Macey, held that Mrs R Stevenson’s complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The judgment states that the respondent, Compass Academy Trust, unfairly dismissed the claimant.
The tribunal also recorded that no percentage deduction would be made to the compensatory award under the principles in Polkey v A.E. Dayton Services Limited [1988] ICR 142. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded in this liability judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and stated that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant. This was a liability judgment only; no monetary award was set out in the decision. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey v A.E. Dayton Services Limited [1988] ICR 142
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.