Case 2301558/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Davies Miss M G Thompson v Group Momentum (Salons) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301558/2023
- Decision date
- 5 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Davies Miss M G Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The respondent company was in compulsory liquidation, and the judgment records that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The Tribunal also recorded that on 05 November 2025 the claimant was given 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim globally and does not set out the individual allegations; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment strikes out the claim globally and does not set out the individual allegations; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim globally and does not set out the individual allegations; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claim globally and does not set out the individual allegations; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the claim globally and does not set out the individual allegations; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.