Case 2301566/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Clancy v Shutterstock (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301566/2021
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Clancy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Clancy's case against Shutterstock (UK) Limited was heard at London South by CVP on 5 October 2023 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall. The claimant did not attend; the respondent was represented by Mr Francis, counsel.
The tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c) on the basis that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a tribunal order, and/or under Rule 37(1)(d) because the claim had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment records no merits findings on any substantive complaint and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action in the extracted text. It states that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c) and/or Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c)
- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.