Case 2301574/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Boadu v System and Solution Ltd, trading as Cleanheat — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301574/2020
- Decision date
- 9 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Curtis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Boadu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 9 May 2022 before Employment Judge Curtis. The Claimant, Mr C Boadu, did not attend and was not represented. The Respondent, System and Solution Ltd trading as Cleanheat, was represented by Mr L Gibson, Managing Director.
Because the Claimant failed to attend or be represented, the tribunal proceeded in his absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations and, having considered the information available to it, dismissed the Claimant’s claims. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal dismissed the claim after the Claimant failed to attend or be represented. The judgment does not record any substantive merits findings. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.