Case 2301575/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Shrubsole v Swalecliffe Pharmacy Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301575/2018
- Decision date
- 29 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Members
- Venue
- Ashford
- Panel members
- Mr Sheath, Mr Newlyn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Shrubsole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent before Employment Judge Corrigan sitting with Mr Sheath and Mr Newlyn on 28 January 2020. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's holiday pay complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. The respondent agreed to pay £300 to the claimant, subject to the appropriate deductions for tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal. The respondent agreed to pay £480 to the claimant within 14 days of the hearing. The parties agreed to bear their own costs.
The judgment contains no findings on the underlying merits of the claims. It is limited to the disposal of the complaints by withdrawal and the agreed payments recorded in the consent judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal by consent; the respondent agreed to pay £300 to the claimant, subject to the appropriate deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Withdrawn | — | £300 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by consent; the respondent agreed to pay £480 to the claimant within 14 days, with the payment covering the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal complaints collectively. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by consent; the respondent agreed to pay £480 to the claimant within 14 days, with the payment covering the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal complaints collectively. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £780
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.