Case 2301576/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Lovell v Duvetco Ltd T/a Ponden Home Interiors — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301576/2020
- Decision date
- 18 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Lovell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 March 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss S Lovell an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concern was that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had not informed the Tribunal that she had obtained the consent of the Administrator or permission of the Court to allow the claim to proceed.
The claimant did not make sufficient representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Sudra struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s). The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant had not informed the Tribunal that she had obtained the Administrator's consent or the Court's permission for the claim to proceed. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.